Supreme Court rejects florist's case against participating in same-sex wedding

1

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Friday it would not take up a case over LGBT rights and religious liberty when it comes to same-sex weddings in a dispute brought by a florist.

The high court declined to hear Barronelle Stutzman’s case after she lost at the Washington Supreme Court when the state attorney general sued her for not providing flowers from her flower shop, Arlene’s Flowers, for a same-sex wedding. The American Civil Liberties Union also filed a lawsuit against the florist on behalf of the couple.

Washington’s highest court concluded she could be forced to participate in the event despite her First Amendment claim that it ran afoul of her beliefs.

Alliance Defending Freedom, a religious liberty law firm representing Ms. Stutzman, took the case to the justices in 2017, but it was remanded back to the lower courts for further consideration in 2018 after the justices ruled for Jack Phillips, a Christian baker, who refused to create a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding in Colorado.

But after reconsidering the case, the Washington Supreme Court still ruled against Ms. Stutzman.

She took her case again to the justices, but on Friday they declined to weigh in on her legal battle.

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas would have agreed to hear the case.

It takes four justices to grant review.

Kristen Waggoner, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom, said the firm will continue to fight to protect First Amendment freedoms.

“A government that can crush someone like Barronelle, who kindly served her gay customer for nearly a decade but simply declined to create art celebrating one sacred ceremony, can use its power to crush any of us regardless of our political ideology or views on important issues like marriage. Thankfully, other courts have recognized that the Constitution does not allow this,” she said. 

“We are confident that the Supreme Court will eventually join those courts in affirming the constitutionally protected freedom of creative professionals to live and work consistently with their most deeply held beliefs,” Ms. Waggoner added.

The American Civil Liberties Union welcomed the court‘s move to reject the legal battle. 

“No one should walk into a store and have to wonder whether they will be turned away because of who they are. Preventing that kind of humiliation and hurt is exactly why we have nondiscrimination laws. Yet 60 percent of states still don’t have express protections for LGBTQ people like the kind in Washington State. Our work isn’t over yet,” said Ria Tabacco Mar, an ACLU lawyer representing the same-sex couple.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

View original post